It clearly doesn't matter what you wear
Oct. 9th, 2011 02:29 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Coming here since I'm sick of writing my asinine grad school personal statements. Not sure if they want me to focus more on my science or my imagined contribution to campus diversity (like my privileged white ass is going to count for anything).
I know I haven't checked or been online much lately. I've been moving computers, which has been taking more time than anticipated.
While I'm here, internet: yes, I have seen this video. I knew it existed long before it was on freaking Family Guy. And I knew of it before Jackson Publick and Doc Hammer talked about it on the Venture Bros. Season 1 commentary, but that is a far more acceptable way of hearing of it. I know it's terrible and awesome and oozing sexual tension, and looks like somebody's hipster faux-bad 80s retro music video. It just needs off-center framing with random splashes of fluorescent color on a film-grain background. Also looks like it was done on one take, fueled with lots of coke.
By the way, boys, I'd still like to see this as a duo costume, no matter how bad Jagger's clothes are.
I know I haven't checked or been online much lately. I've been moving computers, which has been taking more time than anticipated.
While I'm here, internet: yes, I have seen this video. I knew it existed long before it was on freaking Family Guy. And I knew of it before Jackson Publick and Doc Hammer talked about it on the Venture Bros. Season 1 commentary, but that is a far more acceptable way of hearing of it. I know it's terrible and awesome and oozing sexual tension, and looks like somebody's hipster faux-bad 80s retro music video. It just needs off-center framing with random splashes of fluorescent color on a film-grain background. Also looks like it was done on one take, fueled with lots of coke.
By the way, boys, I'd still like to see this as a duo costume, no matter how bad Jagger's clothes are.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-09 05:10 pm (UTC)Um, it's from 1985.
*has nothing more to add*
(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-09 11:12 pm (UTC)